MOTIVE
closeThe typical walk propelling member may be inappropriate
to perform a continuous rolling walk and efficiently
disperse load applied to the sole of the foot.
Accordingly, it may be difficult to more reasonably and
efficiently disperse load and to perform a rolling walk,
along the entire length of the foot, thus degrading functions
of protecting a walker's knee and joints in the foot,
and relaxing the sole of the foot.
Since a typical walk propelling member, as a separate part
such as an air bag or spring, is embedded in a shoe sole,
a shoe sole fabrication process is complicated,
thereby increasing manufacturing costs of a shoe.
BENEFITS
close| 1. | Compared to the normal shoe soles, | |
| shock absorption space increases. | ||
| -> | Improving shock absorption, dispersibility from the outside | |
| 2. | The degrees of freedom in a deformation direction of | |
| the shoe sole are increased | ||
| -> | Natural toes curling by improving the flexibility of the shoe soles, | |
| thus improving energy efficiency and wearing sensation | ||
| 3. | Absorbing the wearer's weight and the shock from the ground, | |
| returning the energy at the same time. | ||
| -> | Optimal effects of exercise | |
| 4. | Removing structurally unnecessary parts. | |
| -> | The shoe sole may be manufactured in light weight | |
| and in low costs. |